
If you’ve been running Google Ads (or any paid ads), you’ve probably come across the term ROAS - Return on Ad Spend. It’s one of the most common metrics used to measure whether ads are “profitable” or not.
ROAS is useful, but lately I’ve found myself introducing clients to an additional way of looking at their marketing performance: Marketing Efficiency Ratio (MER).
It’s not a new idea, and I certainly didn’t invent it. But after learning more about it from others much more in the know than I, it’s one of those concepts that I feel more small businesses should know about.
In this post, I’ll explain what MER is, how it’s different from ROAS, and why it can give you a clearer big-picture view of your marketing.
Let’s start with ROAS. At its simplest, ROAS tells you how much revenue you generate for every £1 you spend on ads. So, if you spend £1,000 and get £4,000 in sales directly attributed to those ads, your ROAS is 400%.
That’s great for looking at individual campaigns or ad groups. You can see which ones are working, which need tweaking, and where to allocate more budget.
But here’s the problem:
Looking too closely at campaign-level ROAS can make you miss the bigger picture. This is where MER comes in.
MER is a high-level metric that looks at your total revenue compared to your total marketing spend.
The formula is simple:
MER = Total Revenue ÷ Total Marketing Spend
So, let’s say:
Your MER is 5. That means for every £1 spent on marketing, you generated £5 in revenue.
Think of ROAS as zooming in and MER as zooming out.
With MER, you’re not worrying about which specific campaign got credit for the sale.
You’re looking at the whole picture of spend versus return.
For example: I recently worked with a small boutique retail business that relied heavily on Google Ads. They did a little bit of SEO, but beyond that, not much else. The challenge was that attribution was a nightmare:
Each platform gave credit in a different way (obviously taking most of the credit too), and it was easy to get lost in the weeds trying to reconcile them. And third-party attribution platforms were way out of their budget scope.
That’s where MER helped. By looking at total revenue versus total marketing spend, we got a clearer picture of whether the overall marketing was efficient, regardless of which channel claimed the credit.
We also separated out new business versus returning customers. This was really useful because it showed whether the spend was driving genuine growth or just bringing back loyal buyers who would likely have purchased anyway. MER made it much easier to see that the investment in ads was paying off in terms of new customer growth as well as overall sales.
If you’re a small business owner, you probably don’t have time to get lost in the weeds of attribution models and last-click versus first-click, etc., debates. You just want to know: Is my marketing spend paying off?
MER helps you answer that question.
A few reasons why I like it for small businesses:
I’m not saying ditch ROAS. It still has its place, especially when you’re making tactical decisions about where to allocate budget.
But MER comes into its own when:
One of my clients spends just under £3,000 a month on Google Ads. Their reported ROAS is around 400%, not bad at all. But they were also spending on SEO and a bit of email marketing.
When we looked at the bigger picture using MER, their total marketing spend was closer to £4,000 a month, with total revenue around £20,000. That gave them an MER of 5.
That’s a healthy ratio, and it reassured them that even though some campaigns looked like they were under-performing on paper, the overall picture was strong.
The nice thing is, you don’t need any fancy tools to start using MER.
Over time, you’ll spot trends. For example, maybe your MER drops when you scale ad spend too quickly, or it improves when you add email marketing into the mix.
Like any metric, MER isn’t perfect. On its own, it won’t tell you where to optimise, and it can’t replace campaign-level insights. Think of it as a health check rather than a detailed diagnosis.
Another thing to keep in mind is customer lifetime value (LTV). When I ask clients how much a customer is worth, many will look at the first order. For example, a retail business might say: “A customer is worth £80.” But if the nature of the product means that customer comes back and buys several times a year, the true value is much higher.
That’s why it’s important not to view MER in isolation. A strong MER tells you your marketing is efficient but combining it with lifetime value gives you a far more realistic picture of growth potential and profitability.
I’ll be writing more about lifetime value in an upcoming blog, so keep an eye out for that if you’d like to dive deeper.
If you’re a small business owner juggling multiple marketing channels, MER is worth adding to your toolkit. It’s simple, it’s high-level, and it helps you answer that all-important question: Is my marketing spend paying off overall?
It’s not about replacing ROAS, but about zooming out and seeing the bigger picture.
And if you’d like help working out what MER (and ROAS) should look like for your business, let’s chat it through.
👉 Book a discovery call with me and I’ll help you make sense of your numbers.
